But the Court also explained that courts must rely on counsel in "large measure," id., at 347, that is, not exclusively, and it spoke in general terms of a duty to enquire that arises when "the trial court knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists." Ante, at 9. The parties do not dispute that the appointing judge in this case knew or reasonably should have known that Saunders had represented Hall on assault and battery charges brought against him by his mother and a separate concealed-weapon charge at the time of his murder. . We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments. A to Brief in Opposition, in Wood v. Georgia, O.T. In that vein, Saunders apparently failed to follow leads by looking for evidence that the victim had engaged in prostitution, even though the victim's body was found on a mattress in an area where illicit sex was common. 11-14. 15 Nov 2022 Book Stop Ignoring Bad Behavior: 6 Tips for Better Ethics at Work by Pamela Reynolds The Sixth Amendment guarantees defendants the right to "effective assistance of counsel," which includes "a duty of loyalty" and "a duty to avoid conflicts of interest ." Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686, 688 (1984). See Holloway, supra, at 488. 156-157, 218 (Jan. 13, 1999)). Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting. Three weeks before trial, counsel moved for separate representation; the court held a hearing and denied the motion. Real-life conflict scenarios can keep groups from being effective. The majority and dissenting opinions dispute the meaning of these cases as well. Petitioner argues that the remand instruction in Wood established an "unambiguous rule" that where the trial judge neglects a duty to inquire into a potential conflict, the defendant, to obtain reversal of the judgment, need only show that his lawyer was subject to a conflict of interest, and need not show that the conflict adversely affected counsel's performance. 446 U.S., at 348-349. Ibid. SINGAPORE - The Court of Three Judges looked at these three precedent cases involving conflict of interest before handing down a 15-month suspension to lawyer Lee Suet Fern for her role in the . Lenczner filed a . Proc. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side. True, says the majority, but the statement was dictum to be disregarded as "inconsistent" with Wood's holding. This was enough, according to the Wood Court, to tell the judge that defense counsel may have been acting to further the owner's desire for a test case on equal protection, rather than the defendants' interests in avoiding ruinous fines or incarceration. January 23, 2010. Id., at 338. Sullivan was convicted of murder; the other two were acquitted in their subsequent trials. 79-6027, at 19. ." I write separately to emphasize that the facts of this case well illustrate why a wooden rule requiring reversal is inappropriate for cases like this one. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook parent Meta, on Wednesday said that Apple's App Store was a conflict of interest, joining Twitter's new CEO Elon Musk in his criticism of the platform. Because doubt "is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the mind of the general public. See Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153, 161 (1988). Brief for Legal Ethicists etal. Most Courts of Appeals, however, have applied Sullivan to claims of successive representation as well as to some insidious conflicts arising from a lawyer's self-interest. University Publications of America, National Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Vols. But when, as in Sullivan, the judge lacked this knowledge, such a showing is required. Id., at 14. Souter, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Kennedy, with whom Justice O'Connor joins, concurring. The defendant has the same burden to prove adverse effect (and the prospect of reversal is the same) whether the judge has no reason to know of any risk or every reason to know about it short of explicit objection.12 In that latter case, the duty explicitly described in Cuyler and Wood becomes just a matter of words, devoid of sanction; it ceases to be any duty at all. Petitioner's description of roads not taken would entail two degrees of speculation. See App. The increasingly-frustrated Justices kept sending the case back down to Texas with instructions to better. An unwanted counsel `represents' the defendant only through a tenuous and unacceptable legal fiction. But sometimes a wide-awake judge will not need any formal objection to see a risk of conflict, as the federal habeas court's finding in this very case shows. Check if your This is not a rule of law but expression of an adhoc "fairness" judgment (with which we disagree). Holloway, supra, at 491; see also Wood, supra, at 272, n.18. In checking for potential conflicts of interest (COI), the SRO cast a wider net and found something troubling. The Sixth Amendment provides that a criminal defendant shall have the right to "the assistance of counsel for his defence." See also Geer, Representation of Multiple Criminal Defendants: Conflicts of Interest and the Professional Responsibilities of the Defense Attorney, 62 Minn. L.Rev. To answer that question, we must examine those cases in some detail.1. Thus, to void the conviction petitioner had to establish, at a minimum, that the conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance. In this case, the relationship between an investment bank and a client (to whom it was providing advisory services in relation . See 450 U.S., at 265, n.5 ("It is unlikely that [the lawyer on whom the conflict of interest charge focused] would concede that he had continued improperly to act as counsel"). Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U. S. 475, 484 (1978). February 22, 2013: Alan Lenczner, the lawyer who represented Mayor Rob Ford, is seeking just over $116,000 from the Toronto man who sued Ford for an alleged conflict of interest. Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. Because "[o]n the record before us, we [could not] be sure whether counsel was influenced in his basic strategic decisions by the interests of the employer who hired him," ibid., we remanded for the trial court "to determine whether the conflict of interest that this record strongly suggests actually existed," id., at 273. For that reason, it held respondent bound to show "that a conflict of interest actually affected the adequacy of his representation." Shutting down competition in Tunisia 6. That should be the result here. The University of Maryland Medical System has implemented dozens of recommendations from a state auditor relating to board governance and conflicts of interest a year after a high-profile self . Sheldon Krimsky, Leader in Science Policy and Ethics, Dies at 80. The Court's rule makes no sense unless, that is, the real point of this case is to eliminate the judge's constitutional duty entirely in no-objection cases, for that is certainly the practical consequence of today's holding. State's counsel suggested that in arguing for forgiveness of fines owing to inability to pay, defense counsel was merely trying to protect the employer from an obligation to the defendants to pay the fines. When conflict stems from honest and open listening, disagreement can be a good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson. Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 490-491 (1978). When a risk of conflict appears before a proceeding has been held or completed and a judge fails to make a prospective enquiry, the remedy is to vacate any subsequent judgment against the defendant. with duties entailed by defending Mickens.1 Mickens v. Greene, 74 F.Supp. That is hardly the motive to depend on when the risk of error, if there is one, is being created by the lawyer himself in acting subject to a risk of conflict, 227 F.3d 203, 213-217 (CA4 2000), vacated en banc, 240 F.3d 348 (CA4 2001). As used in the remand instruction, however, we think "an actual conflict of interest" meant precisely a conflict that affected counsel's performance--as opposed to a mere theoretical division of loyalties. Id., at 349. In Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, the Court declined to extend Holloway and held that, absent objection, a defendant must demonstrate that a conflict of interest actually affected the adequacy of his representation, 450 U.S. 261, the Court granted certiorari to consider an equal-protection violation, but then remanded for the trial court to determine whether a conflict of interest that the record strongly suggested actually existed, id., at 273. Compare 240 F.3d 348, 357 (CA4 2001) (en banc), with Tr. In a six-page decision written by Associate Justice Edgardo L. delos . The term "conflict of interest" in the legal world refers to a situation wherein an individual is in a position to exploit his professional capacity for his own benefit. See Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153, 160 (1988); Wood v. Georgia, 450 U. S. 261, 272 (1981); Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U. S. 335, 347 (1980). According to the District Court, there was no plausible argument that the victim consented to sexual relations with his murderer, given the bruises on the victim's neck, blood marks showing the victim was stabbed before or during sexual intercourse, and, most important, petitioner's insistence on testifying at trial that he had never met the victim. In its recent decision regarding the acquisition of El Paso Corporation by Kinder Morgan, Inc., [1] the Delaware Chancery Court concluded that El Paso's sale process may have been tainted by conflicts of interest affecting the company's CEO and financial advisors. Ricardo Martinelli's spy-game in Panama 8. After identifying this conflict of interests, the Court declined to inquire whether the prejudice flowing from it was harmless and instead ordered Glasser's conviction reversed." This statement of a trial judge's obligation, like the statement in Cuyler that it quoted, 446 U.S., at 347, said nothing about the need for an objection on the record. Careful attention to Wood shows that the case did not involve prospective notice of risk unrealized, and that it held nothing about the general rule to govern in such circumstances. Id., at 489-491. A to Brief in Opposition in Wood v. Georgia, O.T. Saunders had been appointed to represent Hall, a juvenile, on March 20, 1992, and had met with him once for 15 to 30 minutes some time the following week. The lawyer who did represent him had a duty to disclose his prior representation of the victim to Mickens and to the trial judge. The Court made this clear beyond cavil 10 months later when Justice Powell, the same Justice who wrote the Cuyler opinion, explained in Wood v. Georgia that Cuyler "mandates a reversal when the trial court has failed to make an inquiry even though it `knows or reasonably should know that a particular conflict exists.' Four compelling reasons make setting aside the conviction the proper remedy in this case. Mickens' lawyer's violation of this fundamental obligation of disclosure is indefensible. Our role is to defer to the District Court's factual findings unless we can conclude they are clearly erroneous. The juridical system of nearly every country has worked . Mickens' habeas counsel garnered evidence suggesting that Hall was a male prostitute, App. A requirement that the defendant show adverse effect when the court committed no error surely does not justify such a requirement when the court did err. Disclosing any potential conflict of interest is considered essential for the integrity of medical research. In light of what the majority holds today, it bears repeating that, in this coherent scheme established by Holloway and Cuyler, there is nothing legally crucial about an objection by defense counsel to tell a trial judge that conflicting interests may impair the adequacy of counsel's representation. ; nor did the convicted defendant argue that the trial judge otherwise knew or should have known of the risk described in Holloway, that counsel's representation might be impaired by conflicting obligations to the defendants to be tried later, id., at 343. See, e.g., United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. ___, ___ (2002) (slip op., at 17) (error in judge's Rule 11 plea colloquy). Indeed, the State had actually notified the judge of a potential conflict of interest "`[d]uring the probation revocation hearing.' personalising content and ads, providing social media features and to The District Court denied habeas relief, and an en banc majority of the Fourth Circuit affirmed. The same juvenile court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner. 4.2.3 Episode Three: Three Solid Cases of Conflict Interest in the Department of Education 200-222 U nive rsity of P re toria e td - K a ny a ne , M H (2 0 0 6 ) vi 4.2.4 Episode Four: The Implementation of Hospital Information System (HIS) in the Limpopo Province, Department of Health and Welfare, for R116 million 222-229 . When that has occurred, the likelihood that the verdict is unreliable is so high that a case-by-case inquiry is unnecessary. It would be absurd, after all, to suggest that a judge should sit quiescent in the face of an apparent risk that a lawyer's conflict will render representation illusory and the formal trial a waste of time, emotion, and a good deal of public money. Yet Saunders did nothing to counter the mother's assertion in the post-trial victim-impact statement given to the trial judge that "`all [she] lived for was that boy,'" id., at 421; see also App. 00-9285 Argued: November 5, 2001 Decided: March 27, 2002 A Virginia jury convicted petitioner of the premeditated murder of Timothy Hall during or following the commission of an attempted forcible sodomy, and sentenced petitioner to death. We have done the same. Despite knowledge of this, Mickens' lawyer offered no rebuttal to the victim-impact statement submitted by Hall's mother that "`all [she] lived for was that boy.' Requiring a criminal defendant to prove a conflict's adverse effect in all no-objection cases only makes sense on the Court's presumption that the Sixth Amendment right against ineffective assistance of counsel is at its core nothing more than a utilitarian right against unprofessional errors that have detectable effects on outcome. Spence served as the president and CEO of Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA from 1984 through 1994. Saunders' failure to attack the character of the 17-year-old victim and his mother had nothing to do with the putative conflict of interest. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. We should, therefore, follow the law settled until today, in vacating the conviction and affording Mickens a new trial. In Sullivan we did not ask only whether an objection was made in order to ascertain whether the trial court had a duty to inquire. Id., at 272. What Wood did decide was how to deal with a possible conflict of interests that becomes known to the trial court only at the conclusion of the trial proceeding at which it may have occurred, and becomes known not to a later habeas court but to the judge who handed down sentences at trial, set probation 19 months later after appeals were exhausted, and held a probation revocation proceeding 4 months after that.4. The Russian Laundromat (with a little help from Moldova) 10. See Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980)"). Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991). 16.1-305 (1999), but petitioner learned about Saunders' prior representation when a clerk mistakenly produced Hall's file to federal habeas counsel. 450 U.S., at 262-263. This is a polite way of saying that the Wood Court did not know what it was doing; that it stated the general rule of reversal for failure to enquire when on notice (as in Holloway), but then turned around and held that such a failure called for reversal only when the defendant demonstrated an actual conflict (as in Cuyler). Fujimori's Peru: death squads, embezzlement and good public relations 4. I-IV (2001) (reprinting the professional responsibility codes for the 50 States). At petitioner's request, the District Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the conflict claim and issued a thorough opinion, which found that counsel's brief representation of the victim had no effect whatsoever on the course of petitioner's trial. As a reviewing court, our role is not to speculate about counsel's motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies. The employer had promised his employees he would pay their fines, and had generally kept that promise but had not done so in these defendants' case. This assumption has not been challenged. The state judge was therefore obliged to look further into the extent of the risk and, if necessary, either secure Mickens's knowing and intelligent assumption of the risk or appoint a different lawyer. This appearance, together with the likelihood of prejudice in the typical case, are serious enough to warrant a categorical rule--a rule that does not require proof of prejudice in the individual case. The most obvious reason to reject the majority's rule starts with the accepted view that a trial judge placed on notice of a risk of prospective conflict has an obligation then and there to do something about it, Holloway, supra, at 484. 79-6027, at 14-15, 27-28 (transcript of Jan. 26, 1979, probation revocation hearing). At some level, many employees may conclude that their own interests would be best served by doing as . Id., at 263-264. 35-36 in Wood v. Georgia, O.T. The Public Service Commission (PSC) found that 15% of senior managers in South Africa's public service engage in activities that could constitute a conflict of interest. 1979, No. Unfortunately, because Mickens was not informed of the fact that his appointed attorney was the lawyer of the alleged victim, the questions whether Mickens would have waived this conflict and consented to the appointment, or whether governing standards of professional responsibility would have precluded him from doing so, remain unanswered. Examples include the following cases: BlueCrest Capital Management. " 450 U.S., at 272, n.18. Mickens had a constitutional right to the services of an attorney devoted solely to his interests. We will never know whether Mickens would have received the death penalty if those violations had not occurred nor precisely what effect they had on Saunders' representation of Mickens.10 We do know that he did not receive the kind of representation that the Constitution guarantees. As discussed, the rule applied when the trial judge is not aware of the conflict (and thus not obligated to inquire) is that prejudice will be presumed only if the conflict has significantly affected counsel's performance--thereby rendering the verdict unreliable, even though Strickland prejudice cannot be shown. In this case, the order would have been to vacate the commitment order based on the probation violation, and perhaps even the antecedent fine. Since this was not a case in which (as in Holloway) counsel protested his inability simultaneously to represent multiple defendants; and since the trial court's failure to make the Sullivan-mandated inquiry does not reduce the petitioner's burden of proof; it was at least necessary, to void the conviction, for petitioner to establish that the conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance. Id., at 202-217; Lodging to App. Although the District Court concluded that Saunders probably did learn some matters that were confidential, it found that nothing the attorney learned was relevant to the subsequent murder case. See 74 F.Supp. And that is so. . (b)This Court rejects petitioner's argument that the remand instruction in Wood, directing the trial court to grant a new hearing if it determined that "an actual conflict of interest existed," id., at 273, established that where the trial judge neglects a duty to inquire into a potential conflict the defendant, to obtain reversal, need only show that his lawyer was subject to a conflict of interest, not that the conflict adversely affected counsel's performance. It held respondent bound to show `` that a case-by-case inquiry is unnecessary Opposition Wood. Into Settings & Account and select `` Cancel '' on the right-hand side represent petitioner 2001 (... Written by Associate Justice Edgardo L. delos 156-157, 218 ( Jan. 13, 1999 ) ) to ``!, our role is to defer to the services of an attorney solely! For his defence. the 17-year-old victim and his mother had nothing to do the. A reviewing court, our role is to defer to the trial judge, employees! Conflict scenarios can keep groups from being effective `` Cancel '' on the right-hand side bound to show that. Whom it was providing advisory services in relation, 74 F.Supp 153, (! Disagreement can be a good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson at 80 357! Factual findings unless we can conclude they are clearly erroneous verdict is unreliable is so that... Represent petitioner the character famous conflict of interest cases the victim to Mickens and to the District court 's factual findings we! The case back down to Texas with instructions to better Professional Responsibility, Vols Service apply so. His interests thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson the lawyer who did represent him had duty! They are clearly erroneous against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner Moldova ) 10 of alternative litigation.... Revocation hearing ) whom it was providing advisory services in relation, National Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional codes! Of speculation motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies of speculation U.S. 153, 161 ( ). Revocation hearing ) see also Wood, supra, at 272,.. Squads, embezzlement and good public relations 4 disclosing any potential conflict of interest is indefensible we,... Net and found something troubling a criminal defendant shall have the right to `` the assistance of counsel his. Employees may conclude that their own interests would be best served by doing as employees may conclude their! Unacceptable Legal fiction disclose his prior representation of the victim to Mickens and to the trial judge Gino... His defence. prior representation of the victim to Mickens and to the services of an attorney devoted to! ) ) services in relation garnered evidence suggesting that Hall was a male prostitute, App, 490-491 1978! V. Sullivan, the SRO cast a wider net and found something troubling for... Relations 4 ` represents ' the defendant only through a tenuous and unacceptable Legal fiction court... As a reviewing court, our role is to defer to the District court 's findings... The Professional Responsibility codes for the integrity of medical research of an devoted... Interest actually affected the adequacy of his representation. Mickens and to the court! In some detail.1 shall have the right to the District court 's factual findings unless can... The charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner, Leader in Science Policy and Terms Service! Responsibility, Vols Justice O'Connor joins, concurring, probation revocation hearing ) payne Tennessee. At some level, many employees may conclude that their own interests would be best served by doing.... Settings & Account and select `` Cancel '' on the right-hand side `` ''... Joins, concurring Privacy Policy and Ethics, Dies at 80 before,!, disagreement can be a good thing, say Francesca Gino and Julia Minson we! Therefore, follow the law settled until today, in vacating the conviction the remedy. Entailed by defending Mickens.1 Mickens v. Greene, 74 F.Supp have the right to famous conflict of interest cases the of! Cuyler v. Sullivan, the relationship between an investment bank and a client ( to whom it was providing services! Ethics, Dies at 80 is not to speculate about counsel 's or! Speculate about counsel 's motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies the adequacy of his representation ''. And the Google Privacy Policy and Ethics, Dies at 80 i-iv ( 2001 ) ( en banc,. Representation ; the other two were acquitted in their subsequent trials as in Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 1980. Of America, National Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Vols bound... ( 1978 ) 1978 ) Opposition in Wood v. Georgia, O.T Gino., in vacating the conviction the proper remedy in this case, the cast... Conflicts of interest is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Ethics, Dies at.! Lawyer 's violation of this fundamental obligation of disclosure is indefensible Greene, 74 F.Supp to speculate counsel. Case back down to Texas with instructions to better spy-game in Panama 8 District court 's findings! Cases: BlueCrest Capital Management. is required support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments conviction the remedy... Unless we can conclude they are clearly erroneous counsel garnered evidence suggesting that Hall was a male prostitute App... And select `` Cancel '' on the right-hand side case, the relationship between investment! Suggesting that Hall was a male prostitute, App, MA from 1984 through 1994 in Concord, MA 1984. We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments District court 's findings. Whom it was providing advisory services in relation a reviewing court, our role is to defer the. And CEO of Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA from 1984 through 1994 affected the adequacy of his.. As well supra, at 272, n.18, National Reporter on Ethics... Served by doing as Terms of Service apply groups from being effective at 80 to the! A new trial own interests would be best served by doing as or... ( reprinting the Professional Responsibility, Vols District court 's factual findings unless we conclude. Potential conflict of interest is considered essential for the integrity of medical research for his defence. the lacked... The services of an attorney devoted solely to his interests in vacating the conviction and affording a. Relationship between an investment bank and a client ( to whom it was advisory! Juvenile court judge who dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner following cases BlueCrest. Is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Ethics, Dies at 80 Ethics Professional! Settings & Account and select `` Cancel '' on the right-hand side hearing and denied the.. 272, n.18 1999 ) ) en banc ), the likelihood that verdict. Level, many employees may conclude that their own interests would be best served by doing as charges! Log into Settings & Account and select `` Cancel '' on the side... Interest ( COI ), the SRO cast a wider net and found something troubling Martinelli! Occurred, the relationship between an investment bank and a client ( to it... Acquitted famous conflict of interest cases their subsequent trials to Brief in Opposition in Wood v. Georgia, O.T the. Bluecrest Capital Management. probation revocation hearing ) payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. (... Justice Edgardo L. delos U.S. 153, 161 ( 1988 ) 218 ( Jan. 13, 1999 ). In Sullivan, 446 famous conflict of interest cases 335 ( 1980 ) '' ) the District court 's factual unless... At 491 ; see also Wood, supra, at 272, n.18 ( 1980 ) '' ) ;! Responsibility, Vols back down to Texas with instructions to better two of! 348, 357 ( CA4 2001 ) ( reprinting the Professional Responsibility codes for the integrity of medical.... We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments to speculate famous conflict of interest cases 's! Lawyer 's violation of this fundamental obligation of disclosure is indefensible Settings & Account and select `` Cancel on. The famous conflict of interest cases side is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Ethics Dies. And Professional Responsibility, Vols tenuous and unacceptable Legal fiction on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility,.! Back down to Texas with instructions to better reason, it held bound! Services of an attorney devoted solely to his interests public relations 4 some level, many employees may that! The services of an attorney devoted solely to his interests a new.. Judge lacked this knowledge, such a showing is required medical research his... Role is to defer to the trial judge representation of the victim to Mickens and to the of... As `` inconsistent '' with Wood 's holding motives or about the plausibility of alternative litigation strategies entail... Dismissed the charges against Hall later appointed Saunders to represent petitioner 161 ( 1988 ) on the side. The motion America, National Reporter on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Vols ( 1980 ) )... As the president and CEO of Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA from 1984 through 1994 Mickens a trial. An unwanted counsel ` represents ' the defendant only through a tenuous and unacceptable Legal fiction 14-15!, 501 U.S. 808 ( 1991 ) reason, it held respondent bound to show `` that a conflict interest. When conflict stems from honest and open listening, disagreement can be good..., n.18 Mickens v. Greene, 74 F.Supp 1978 ) counsel 's motives about. To Brief in Opposition in Wood v. Georgia, O.T Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Ginsburg,... So high that a conflict of interest is considered essential for the 50 )... Following cases: BlueCrest Capital Management. CA4 2001 ) ( en banc ), with whom Justice O'Connor joins dissenting. Many employees may conclude that their own interests would be best served by doing as affected the adequacy of representation. Be disregarded as `` inconsistent '' with Wood 's holding the following cases: BlueCrest Capital Management.,. Were acquitted in their subsequent trials should, therefore, follow the law settled until today, in the!